ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1996-03760
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 3B (first-term, second-term or career airman who was ineligible to reenlist, the ineligible condition no longer exists, and the airman requires Selective Reenlistment Program consideration or reconsideration; AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, is required; Dont separate airmen with this RE code) be changed to allow him reentry into military service.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 6 May 97, the Board considered a similar appeal and granted the applicants request to change his RE code to 3B. For an accounting of the facts and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E.
In his current submission, he states that he was advised by his recruiter that his package for Officer Training School (OTS) could not be submitted because the waiver for his RE code was denied. He further states that at the time, he had completed all the necessary requirements, to include achieving competitive Air Force Officer Qualification Test (AFOQT) scores, physical exam, essay, and letters of recommendations.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Based on the evidence provided, it appears the Boards previous correction in 1997 of the applicants record, changing his reentry code from 2I to 3B failed to provide the intended relief. Additionally, we note that under Air Force policy at the time, a 3B code was not to be assigned at the time of the members discharge, which in effect the previous correction did. Therefore, under the circumstances of the applicants discharge, it appears the more appropriate code would be 3K and we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his reentry code issued in conjunction with his honorable discharge on 27 July 1996 was 3K.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-1996-03760 in Executive Session on 21 January 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 28 May 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 23 Dec 08, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03526
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03526 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code 4I which denotes Serving on Control Roster be changed to 3K which denotes Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or AFBCMR when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or 3B which denotes 1st or 2nd term or career airman ineligible to reenlist. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served his...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03058
The supervisor stated that he was unable to select the applicant for reenlistment at the time because the applicant had not demonstrated the desire or capability to accept the additional duties and responsibilities required of a career airman in today’s Air Force. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was not selected for reenlistment in the Air Force. Furthermore, it now seems that the applicant has the motivation and the desire to commit himself to the service of his country.
The Medical Consultant is of the opinion that the applicant’s request for change of his RE code should be approved, this code being 3B as noted above or 3K (Reserved for use by Headquarters Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other RE code applies or is appropriate). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Procurement Programs & Procedures Manager, AFPC/DPPAE, also reviewed this...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03383
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03383 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed in a manner to allow him to enter the Air National Guard. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1996-03389A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1996-03389A INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant's appeal for reconsideration, she requests the “4C” Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code on her DD Form 214 be changed or waived. Applicant was separated on 28 September 1995, in the grade of airman...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04610
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04610 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 3K Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR be changed to 1J Eligible to Reenlist Elected Separation or Discharge. His separation date was 22 July 2009 and there was not enough time, between the date of the remitted...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03392
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004- 03392 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 MAY 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 3K be changed to a more favorable 1-series RE code. To date, they have not received any additional documentation or had any contact...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05227
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JA recommends the applicants request be approved and that his re-entry (RE) code be updated once the lost time is removed from his records. At the same time, the applicant requested that his lost time be re-calculated; however, as the commander non-concurred with his request, the lost...
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted two letters of recommendation from the commander of the Air Force Band of the Golden West and the commander of the Air Force Band of Mid-America. A review of the applicant’s military personnel records revealed an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, dated 13 Jan 99, denying him reenlistment. Therefore, as a matter of clemency, we recommend that the applicant’s RE Code be changed to “3K.” This is a code that can be waived...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02557
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...